Skip to main content

The Clarity Loop: Turning Confusion into Lasting Understanding

In my article Two Types of Gaps, I explained why not all “I don’t know” moments are the same.
The Clarity Loop is my method for tackling Level 2 gaps — the kind that frustrate you in the moment but, when resolved, can create massive mental unlocks.

Why the Clarity Loop Works​

Most people try to patch confusion with a quick search or by skimming docs until something feels right.
That may help in the moment, but it often fades quickly.

The Clarity Loop works differently because it forces you to:

  1. Pause instead of skipping over the confusing part
  2. Engage deeply with the concept
  3. Rebuild understanding in your own words
  4. Store it in a form you can find later

By doing this, you’re not just solving the immediate problem — you’re building a mental anchor that makes the idea easier to recall and apply in the future.

The Clarity Loop Framework​

Step 1 — Identify the Gap​

  • Comes from your Level 2 list — those “this doesn’t make sense” moments.
  • Resist the urge to move on without resolving it.

Step 2 — Deep Dive​

  • Read, watch, or review the material surrounding the gap.

  • Wikipedia can be a great resource here — it often gives you a bird’s-eye view of the subject and a clear division of subtopics.

    • Why are these divisions made that way?
    • What are the defining characteristics of the categories?

  • From here, try to deduce:

    • Hard vs. soft boundaries
    • Whether the categories are MECE (mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive)
    • Set/subset/superset relationships, and based on what characteristics

  • You might find examples that don’t cleanly map — that’s when you bring in a sparring partner (like an LLM) to stress-test your thinking.

Step 3 — Collaborate or Discuss​

  • Explain your confusion to someone else or to an LLM like ChatGPT.
  • The act of framing the question often exposes hidden assumptions.

Step 4 — Write to Clarify​

  • Rebuild the explanation in your own words.
  • Keep it short and searchable — this becomes your personal reference.
  • If it’s worth sharing, publish it — teaching others further reinforces your understanding.

Step 5 — Validate and Persist the Resolution​

  • Check your explanation against edge cases.

  • Try applying the concept in a different context.

  • If this is something you don’t use often, or it’s a second-class citizen in your workflow (e.g., preferring a CTE chain over HAVING, or using emit-to-parent over v-model), deliberately promote it to first-class status for a while.

  • Persist the resolution — write it down somewhere you’ll find it later.

    • This is why I maintain technical articles: they’re my own searchable archive so future me doesn’t fall into the same micro-confusions.
    • See Reconstruct to Remember for more on turning these into durable references.

Why This Is More Than Just Note-Taking​

A Clarity Loop dive can be tiny — sometimes just a 10-minute check-in — but it can be a massive unlock because it:

  • Gives you a talking point you can clearly articulate
  • Creates a thinking point you can reason from in future problem-solving
  • Becomes a mental anchor for connecting related concepts later

Even if you were “pretty good” with the topic already, this extra pass often reframes it in a way that sticks.

Example: Inversions from Larry’s Array​

Sorting algorithms are A-listers — they headline textbooks, dominate interview prep, and get endless coverage. Inversions, on the other hand, are more like the assistant to the caterer — crucial to the event, but barely mentioned in the credits.

I was working through the “Larry’s Array” puzzle when I spotted a symmetry property. ChatGPT pointed out: “That’s really about whether the number of inversions is even or odd.”

Inversions? I knew I had to pause right there — this was a gap.

That deep dive clarified two things instantly:

  1. Inversions aren’t a one-per-item deal — a single element can contribute many.
  2. They’re a concrete way to measure “distance” from being sorted.

Even if I’d skimmed past inversions before, this time they stuck. Not just because I knew what they were, but because I could now tie them directly to the original symmetry insight and to a mental picture of counting them in a real array.

When to Use the Clarity Loop​

  • You hit a Level 2 gap from the Two Types of Gaps list
  • You find yourself skipping over something because “it’s good enough for now”
  • You notice a contradiction in your mental model
  • You’re teaching or explaining a concept and stall out

The Payoff​

The Clarity Loop isn’t about becoming an expert in everything — it’s about systematically converting confusion into clarity so it doesn’t haunt you later.

Use it consistently, and over time your “mental toolbox” will fill with concepts you can explain, apply, and adapt without hesitation.