Reconstruct to Remember
If you can’t retrieve it when you need it, you didn’t really learn it.
That’s a hard truth—and a transformative one.
🧠 Why ChatGPT (or Any LLM) Can’t Fix That for You
An LLM can:
- Answer specific questions
- Fill in gaps in understanding
- Summarize documentation
But it can’t:
- Tell you what you’ve failed to internalize
- Detect that your friction isn’t with q-table, but with the abstraction model behind it (slots, scoping, binding)
- Know what you’ve learned but didn’t retain
- Replace your personal reference model
I realized this after struggling with Vue’s q-table. Not once, not twice—but repeatedly. And every time I thought, “This component is annoying.”
But eventually, it clicked:
I never actually learned how slots work. I’d skimmed docs, watched videos, even seen the Vue Mastery example. But I never transformed the knowledge into something reusable.
And once I did—by writing my own quick-reference and structuring it in my own terms—it finally clicked. That’s not inefficiency. That’s how mastery is built.
🔄 Passive Consumption vs. Structured Internalization
Mode | Outcome |
---|---|
Watching tutorials | Feels familiar during playback, fades after a week |
Skimming docs | Works when you’re already close to the answer |
Asking ChatGPT | Solves the problem in the moment, doesn’t imprint |
Writing your own notes | Forces mental digestion, builds recall scaffolding |
Publishing references | Externalizes your knowledge into reusable systems |
Structured documentation isn’t just memory—it’s mental infrastructure.
✍️ Simulated Teaching: Why It Works
When you write something for yourself, you’re not just documenting—you’re teaching future you.
And that creates a powerful loop:
- “Is this clear?”
- “Would this confuse a beginner?”
- “Why does this abstraction even exist?”
- “Could I explain this without naming the tool?”
Every one of those questions strengthens your grasp.
This is why the act of writing is not a waste of time—it’s the final stage of learning.
🧱 Recognition ≠ Reconstruction
It’s easy to feel like you “know” something because you’ve seen it before.
But recognition isn’t recall. And it’s definitely not reconstruction.
Real understanding is when you can rebuild the idea from scratch in your own words—no training wheels.
🔗 Related Reading
If this resonates with you, you’ll probably enjoy these as well:
-
🚧 Learning System: Identify the Gaps You Don’t Know You Have A structured look at how I use writing and reflection to diagnose missing understanding—before it costs me in production.
-
🧨 Why the Busy Beaver Problem Never Clicked—Until It Did (LinkedIn post) What changed wasn’t the content, but the framing. Once I reframed the problem in terms of compression, pattern emergence, and meta-abstraction, it became one of the most fascinating ideas I’d ever studied.