Skip to main content

🧱 The Three Layers of Performance Work

(Plus the Invisible Layer 0: Impact Awareness)

🕳️ Layer 0: Impact Awareness​

“Before optimizing, ask: will this even matter?”

This is the meta-layer.

Sometimes the fastest diff algorithm isn’t worth implementing—because the data is small and the impact is negligible.
Sometimes the naive O(n²) implementation is fine, because the scale doesn’t grow or the call site is rare.

Performance work starts by asking where it’s worth caring.

Layer 0 isn’t about code. It’s about context.

This is where product intuition and engineering judgment overlap.

Layer 1: Foundational Correctness​

“If this is wrong, nothing else matters.”

Time and space complexity. Basic algorithmic sanity.
Avoiding unnecessary quadratic loops. Choosing hash maps over linear scans for lookups.

You might have the right system design (Layer 2) and still hit a wall because your implementation is fundamentally flawed.

Necessary but not sufficient—if Layer 1 is broken, nothing else can save you.

Layer 2: Strategic Design Tradeoffs​

“How should this system fundamentally work?”

Here you make architectural calls:

  • Merkle trees vs full diffs
  • Batch vs stream
  • Local compute vs remote lookup
  • Push vs pull

These decisions define the performance envelope of your system.

Time/space complexity still matters here, but the leverage comes from structure, not micro-tuning.

Layer 3: Precision Optimization of the Hot Path​

“We already picked the right design. Now: how tight can we make it?”

Now you’re working on the part that actually runs often enough to matter.

This is the domain of:

  • Cache locality
  • Branch prediction
  • Lock contention
  • Syscall profiling
  • eBPF & flame graphs
  • Memory alignment
  • Fast vs slow paths

Here, you’re not guessing—you’re tracing and measuring real workloads. Then making surgical changes with outsized effects.

This is not premature optimization. This is earned optimization.

⚖️ Interplay & Overlap​

Layers 1 and 2 often intermix.

  • Choosing a structure (Layer 2) affects time/space complexity (Layer 1).
  • Layer 3 tuning only makes sense after Layer 2 design decisions and Layer 1 correctness are in place.
  • Layer 0 awareness keeps you from wasting time on changes that don’t matter.

🧠 Final Takeaway​

Not all performance work is worth doing.
Not all tradeoffs are worth debating.
Not all bottlenecks need eliminating.

But when it is worth it—when you’ve earned the right to optimize—this model helps you:

  • Ask the right questions
  • Focus on the right layers
  • Avoid optimizing noise
  • Put energy where it will actually matter