Stop Loss vs. Stop Bleed: Escaping the Margin Call Spiral
Introduction​
In leveraged markets, the default advice is simple: use a stop loss. But a stop loss isn’t the only way to manage risk. There’s another option — one I call the Stop Bleed. Instead of cutting the trade or endlessly adding margin, you can hedge the other side of your position, freezing P&L in place.
The Margin Call Spiral​
Here’s how it usually goes:
- You go long. Price moves against you.
- Your margin shrinks.
- You either cut the trade (realizing a loss) or add collateral.
- Many traders keep adding, entering the margin call spiral until liquidation wipes the account.
Pop culture dramatizes this cycle (The Big Short, for instance). The assumption is: to be right eventually, you must bleed until the market agrees.
But in perpetual futures markets, you don’t.
Stop Loss vs. Stop Bleed​
- Stop Loss → Exit entirely. Conviction is abandoned.
- Stop Bleed → Hedge the other side. Exposure goes neutral. Your position stops bleeding (or strengthening).
Think of it as pressing pause instead of eject.
Why Delta-Neutral Works​
- Directional risk frozen: A long of 2 SOL hedged with a short of 2 SOL means price swings no longer impact PnL.
- Funding offset: One side pays funding, the other side receives it. Your net cost is minimal.
- Flexibility: When conditions shift, you lift the hedge and re-engage without having been liquidated or forced out.
Real-World Test (to be updated)​
I’ll be running a small test portfolio with 1–2 SOL to measure this in practice:
- Funding flows over several days.
- Execution costs of entering/exiting hedges.
These results will be added here as a real case study.
The Mental Shift​
The Stop Bleed isn’t glamorous. It won’t make you money on its own. But it does one thing very well: it buys time.
- You survive without capitulating.
- You preserve optionality.
- You avoid the spiral.
It’s not weakness — it’s discipline.