Global Escrow Example

Let’s build an example that’s impossible in the old world:
Three people from three different countries pooling small stakes into a shared escrow — without banks, lawyers, or intermediaries.

---

The Scenario

• Proposer: A person in Canada with an idea (say, an open-source tool).
• Backers: Two supporters — one in Germany, one in Japan — each willing to stake $5 equivalent.
• Arbiter: A small organization in Boston, responsible for validating results and triggering payout.

All participants operate in their native currencies — CAD, EUR, JPY — but on-chain they transact in a common stablecoin (e.g., USDC).

---

The Flow

1. Create the escrow

   • The proposer deploys a smart contract that defines:
     • The project terms (terms_hash → IPFS/Arweave doc)
     • An arbiter address
     • A funding target
     • Rules for resolution/refund
   • This contract automatically creates a vault account to hold funds.

2. Fund the escrow

   • Each backer sends their stake (converted to USDC via an on-ramp).
   • The contract records contributors and totals.

3. Lock phase

   • When the total reaches the target, the state flips to Committed.
   • Funds are now frozen — no withdrawals until resolution.

4. Resolution

   • The arbiter (or quorum of arbiters) evaluates deliverables.
   • If satisfied → triggers resolve(payouts[]).
   • If conditions fail or expire → refund_all() automatically returns funds.

5. Settlement

   • Payouts happen on-chain, instantly and transparently.
   • Each participant can verify the full transaction history.

---

Why This Matters

Traditional cross-border micro-escrow is nearly impossible:

• Banks have minimum transaction fees far larger than the $5 stake.
• Licensing requirements block non-custodial pooling.
• Currency conversion and legal boundaries add friction.

On-chain, all that complexity collapses into:

• One program
• One stablecoin
• One set of rules everyone can read

---

Practical Design

On-chain roles:

Role	Key Permissions	Example Implementation
Proposer	Initialize escrow	create_escrow()
Backer	Deposit stake	stake(amount)
Arbiter	Resolve, trigger payouts	resolve(payouts[])
Program	Enforce deadlines, handle refunds	Time-locked logic

State machine:

Open → Committed → Resolved → Settled (or Refunded)

Data model (simplified):

struct Escrow {
    proposer: Pubkey,
    arbiter: Pubkey,
    vault: Pubkey,
    terms_hash: [u8; 32],
    min_total: u64,
    deadline: i64,
    status: u8, // 0=Open,1=Committed,2=Resolved,3=Refunded
}

---

Why It’s More Than Just a Payment

Each deposit represents conditional participation, not a purchase. Backers aren’t “paying”; they’re staking on an outcome. Their $5 is active capital that moves only when logic allows.

You could generalize this same system to:

• Scientific bounties
• Open-source milestone rewards
• Community grants
• Decentralized prediction markets

---

Key Takeaway

This model demonstrates the power of programmable escrow:

• Global participation without intermediaries.
• Instant, rule-based payouts without legal complexity.
• Auditable trail that can’t be rewritten.

Where fiat systems choke on $2 international transactions, smart contracts make them effortless.